Pipekit Cloud vs Self-Hosted
Pipekit Cloud and Self-Hosted Pipekit deployment models, side by side.
Component
Pipekit Cloud
Self-Hosted
Last updated
Pipekit Cloud and Self-Hosted Pipekit deployment models, side by side.
Pipekit ships in two deployment shapes. Both run the Pipekit Agent inside your Kubernetes Cluster; they differ in where the control plane (UI, API, database) lives.
Control plane
Hosted by Pipekit
Hosted by you (Kubernetes via Helm)
Pipekit Agent
Runs in your cluster
Runs in your cluster
Argo Workflows
Runs in your cluster
Runs in your cluster
Workflow data
Stored in your cluster; metadata in Pipekit Cloud
Stored entirely in your infrastructure
Logs
Optional: Pipekit Cloud or your own backend
Your own backend (optional Pipekit log storage)
Identity provider
Configured per Organization
Configured per Organization
Network connection
Outbound only (agent → Pipekit Cloud via Redis)
All in-cluster; can run fully air-gapped
Choose Pipekit Cloud for the fastest evaluation path and lowest operational overhead. Choose Self-Hosted when your security, compliance, or air-gapping requirements rule out a hosted control plane.
To evaluate Pipekit Cloud, see Get Started > Evaluate Pipekit Cloud. To deploy Self-Hosted, see Self-Hosting Pipekit.
Last updated